圣经的可靠性：回应伊斯兰的“篡改论“

核心论证 Core Argument

穆斯林常声称圣经已被篡改（Tahrif），但这与古兰经自身的教导矛盾。古兰经多次确认之前经典的权威性（5:46-47, 10:94, 3:3-4），命令穆斯林参考之前的经文。如果圣经已被篡改，古兰经确认一部被篡改的经文就动摇了自身可靠性。 死海古卷的发现具有决定性意义。1947年发现的这些手稿比之前已知的最早希伯来文旧约手稿早约1000年，却与后来的马索拉文本几乎完全一致，证明旧约在超过千年传抄中保持了极高准确性。 古兰经创造了自我矛盾的困境：如果圣经在穆罕默德时代可靠（古兰经暗示如此），那么当时与今天基本相同的圣经清楚教导耶稣的神性和十字架救赎。如果圣经更早被篡改，古兰经确认被篡改的经文就是错误的。无论哪种情况伊斯兰立场都面临内在矛盾。 新约学者梅茨格和华莱士的研究表明新约手稿证据远超任何其他古代文献——超过5800份希腊文手稿、10000+份拉丁文手稿。文本批判学能以极高精度重建原文。

Muslims often claim the Bible was corrupted (Tahrif), but this contradicts the Quran itself, which repeatedly affirms previous scriptures' authority (5:46-47, 10:94, 3:3-4) and commands consulting them. If the Bible was corrupted, the Quran affirming a corrupted text undermines its own reliability. The Dead Sea Scrolls are decisive. Found in 1947, these manuscripts predate the previously earliest known Hebrew OT manuscripts by ~1,000 years, yet are nearly identical to the later Masoretic Text, proving extremely high accuracy over millennia of copying. The Quran creates a self-contradictory dilemma: if the Bible was reliable in Muhammad's time (the Quran implies this), then that Bible — textually identical to today's — clearly teaches Jesus' deity and the Cross's atonement. If the Bible was corrupted earlier, the Quran affirming a corrupted text is erroneous. Either way, the Islamic position faces internal contradiction. NT scholars Metzger and Wallace show NT manuscript evidence far surpasses any other ancient document — over 5,800 Greek manuscripts, 10,000+ Latin manuscripts. Textual criticism reconstructs the original with extremely high precision.